« Major DevelopmentsPresident's Compromise »

More Caution from California

03/01/10 | by Adam Dougherty [mail] | Categories: Cost Containment

A new study released in Health Affairs highlights a potential cause of out-of-control growth in health care expenditure. The interesting trend, taking California as a bellwether case-study, suggests that cost growth is a result of an increased integration/consolidation of provider market share in response to low public payment rates. These health system 'mergers' (such as hospital acquisitions, IPAs and HMOs) increase market power, thus allowing for a 'monopolized' increase in payment rates. Insurers argue that these increases in costs result in a parallel increase in premiums.

More interesting, the study suggests that the proposed Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) and other care integration models in federal health reform could result in similar higher rates for private payers. Interviews in the study suggest that the ultimate intention of care coordination/disease management (from a provider perspective) may simply be increased market share. The authors also suggest that current antitrust policy has not been effective in challenging hospital mergers. They conclude that "unless market mechanisms can be found to discipline providers’ use of their growing market power, it seems inevitable that policy makers will need to turn to regulatory approaches, such as putting price caps on negotiated private-sector rates and adopting all-payer rate setting."

Maryland just so happens to have a working all-payer rate setting regulation (coupled with relief for lower hospital Medicare/Medicaid reimbursement rates), and as seen by the graph below has effectively been able to control cost growth without jeopardizing quality. Read more about the mechanism in a recent post.

In other news, sources indicate that a revised White House 'Compromise 2.0' bill will be unveiled on Wednesday that will most likely include Republican ideas from last week's Health Care Summit like easing the interstate sale of insurance and stronger malpractice reform language. The bill is intended to be a modest package, and Obama will likely outline that it be pursued through reconciliation to be passed into law alongside the Senate bill.

No feedback yet

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)

Follow us on

Twitter   Facebook
July 2010
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

In the wake of successful passage of the most comprehensive federal health legislation since Medicare, the focus now comes back to the states for effective implementation. California is in the midst of an unprecedented fiscal crisis, and many state health programs face an uncertain future. For California's uninsured population and safety net system, it is of the utmost importance to connect the dots between the state budget, program financing, the §1115 waiver, and public-private partnerships as a bridge to full federal reform implementation. This blog will allow our readers to be better informed on all issues regarding reform's incremental induction, in addition to the latest developments out of Sacramento and from around the state. Stay tuned for regular updates, and as always, your comments and questions are welcomed!

Search

XML Feeds

July 2010
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

User tools

powered by b2evolution free blog software